Final Web Project
Goal:
In this project, you
shall create your own web site on BUBBS. We will prepare you through this
project through a couple of lab assignments. You must first choose a subject of
interest and then develop web pages around that subject with coherent contents,
appealing graphics, and pleasant layout. For example, the subject could be you
and your family, your church, your fellowship group, your company, your
favorite theologian to name a few. I recommend you to explore through some
sample web projects listed below to get an idea of what people have done in the
past. The following is a list of basic requirements:
Basic requirements:
- Your site must contain at
least 5 pages. The contents and graphics of the web pages must be decent with respect to the faith standard of
the Biola community and respect the intellectual
properties of others.
- One of your pages should be
named as index.html (or
index.htm). This is going to be the "Home Page" of
your website, and people can access your site by the URL: http://www.bubbs.biola.edu/~YourFirstName.MiddleName.LastName/
- The pages must contain links
to one another so that you can conveniently navigate from any of the pages
to any other pages of your web site.
- In total, you should include
in your web pages at least 10 pictures, each of which must be well
polished by PhotoShop or other graphics programs into a reasonable size
and good quality.
Sample website projects
|
CSCI 104 Nature of Computing Fall 2006
|
|
Anderson, Kelsey Ellis
|
Fowler, Aaron James
|
Marquedant, Stephanie Grace
|
Sellick,
Benjamin Lee
|
|
Anduray, Nancy Lizzette
|
Frank,
Samantha Jane
|
Omran, Tatiana Serene
|
Simons, Scott Patrick
|
|
Baker,
Joel Alan
|
Fung,
Aaron Shiel
|
Pearce,
Leigh Marian
|
Siu,
Elliott Wing-Yun
|
|
Brittain, Mary Ann
|
Groves, Matthew
William
|
Poole, Sean Christopher
|
Smit,
Michael Steven
|
|
Brown, Araceli Reanne
|
Hallum, Ryan Wesley
|
Preslik, Alicia D.
|
Thomas,
Nathan Louis
|
|
Chen, Ivan
|
Herrmann,
David Michael
|
Rangel, Rachel Brittany
|
Washburn, Stefani Nicole
|
|
Christensen,
Jennifer Marie
|
Higgins,
Jared Robert
|
Ruiz, Amanda
Nichole
|
Webster, Jeff Joseph
|
|
Deputy,
Kristin Leigh
|
Jaros, Thomas Kurt
|
Rutenbar, Caroline Jean
|
Zeh, Emily Marie
|
Timeline of the web project:
·
Wednesday, April 30. Project proposal due: Determine
the subject of your website and the general outline of what you will have in
your web pages. For each perspective web page you will create, shortly describe
the contents of the page, the images/graphics needed in the page, and how you
will lay out the text and images in the page. Include your proposal in the weekly progress report.
·
Wednesday, May 7.
First prototype.
Report to me (in your weekly progress report ) the URL of the homepage of your website.
·
May 12 ~ May 14. In-class public
demo to receive feedbacks and polish the work further. Start writing
your reviews of the web pages for other group members, and send an email to
them to remind them to do the review of your work.
·
Monday, May 19. Final website due. Include your peer reviews of the other group members’ work in
your progress report.
Peer review groups
The class
is divided into the following peer-review groups.
|
Review Groups
|
Members of the group
|
|
Group A
|
Austin, Brendan Charles
|
Dingman, Kyle Evan
|
Morales, Natalee Aida
|
Schroeder, Andrew J
|
|
Group B
|
Bagge, Allan Ellis
|
Glazener, Jeremy Chad
|
Morin, Michael Allan
|
Smith, Kevin Mark
|
|
Group C
|
Barker, Michael Joseph
|
Jones, Daniel Wayne
|
Newberry, Julie Nicole
|
Surma, Colleen Lisa
|
|
Group D
|
Barnett, Daniel A.
|
Martin, Michael Shane
|
Nixon, April Rose
|
Yao, Amy Yung Fen
|
|
Group E
|
Collier, Jacqueline Rachel
|
Mitchell, Kelsey Lauren
|
Salisbury, Daniel Stephen
|
|
Evaluation: 50% of grade of your web project is determined by the peer
reviews of your first prototype website while the other 50% determined by me
according to the final quality of your website.
For each member of your peer review group, you should provide a number
in a 0-5 scale in each of the following areas
·
Contents: How well does each page portray a
clear subject and solid contents
·
Graphics: How well are the images created and
polished using graphics software like Photoshop.
·
Layout: How well are the contents (text and
images) lay out and is it convenient to navigate through the pages.
For the 0-5 scale, the following describes how you should interpreter
the scale
·
0: Blank. Nothing done in this area at all.
·
1: Just barely very minimal done in this
area.
·
2: Better than 1, but it needs significant major
improvements.
·
3: It is reasonably done but some minor
improvements can make it better
·
4: It is well done in this area and makes the
website fairly appealing.
·
5: I am so impressed. The website is among the
best I have ever seen on the Internet.